last and definitely least

Ok, much against my will, I have to defend my honour and my interpretation of the theory. This is why I should study harder and become a dean's lister because then I do not need to keep defending my theory.:P. tch.



Perhaps, I was not very clear in my earlier post but permit me to clarify

1) The ladder is a hypothetical ladder. Just because you rank someone attractive, higher, does not mean that you will jump into bed with them, no questions asked.I credit men with brains. If you were in a relationship with a 6 and a 9 came along, guy in question in all probability would consider sleeping with her but may NOT ACT UPON IT due to various reasons. But hypothetically sleeping,uh, speaking,if you were put in a blank box, you would choose to sleep with/ pursue a relationship with a 9 rather than your gf, who is a 6

2)Misconception 1: ATTRACTION here does not make up physical attraction alone!! Attractiveness is subjective and can compose of various other components such as charm, connectivity, chemistry, position, money, educational qualifications, ideals, thoughts etc. etc amongst these looks ranking according to your own prioratisation and hence, how you rank the individual

3)Attractiveness is something you look in for a friend. Please read point 2 again before you all flap your mouth and say "OMG! you're only friends with good looking people". You need to like someone even if you just want to be their friend, duh. Men do NOT need 2 ladders because they are capable of handling someone they have slept with still as a friend because that attraction has not diminished. For women, because the act of sex is SUCH, it becomes a wee bit more complex

4)I was asked, does that mean all my guy friends want to sleep with me?
(Let's put the theories aside and let me reassure you, yes, they do :D)

If I rank up high enough on that person's ladder, then yes. If not, then he'd not want to sleep with me voluntarily, unless combined with a certain number of factors, one of which is probably copius amounts of alcohol. He would not want to sleep with me but if circumstances were such, and he did, he would still be able to treat me as per normal. But the question here,if yes, is whether or not he acts upon it. Refer back to pt 1

Misconception here, is that the ladders are all batting for the same team. So FYI, Person you want to screw may not want to screw you back!
But the thing here is, if there was a guy who was not into me but I was into him, he'd have no qualms about sleeping with me yet still maintaining a sense of normalcy in the relationship. If there was a guy who was into me but I was not into him, there's no way I'd let him near me with a ten foot pole. because I, as a female, define sex differently and hence, unless there was a set of circumstances which allowed him to jump ladders, (in this case, probably not)a guy encased as a friend will not be slept with. Men, on the other hand have no qualms with sleeping with a friend.

I'm not being rah rah feminist. I said men have brains.

Excuse any incoherence or incomplete sentences. dueced sleepy.
Further questions or debating, please msn or call me. Because I seriously think my blog, can be put to better use than as a ping pong table :)